Volume 3, Issue 4 | July 2016
Image | Colon

A Game of ColoMonopoly

Download PDF

Rahman Nakshabendi, MD1, Ozdemir Kanar, MD1, Nicholas Agresti, MD2, and Andrew C. Berry, DO3

1Department of Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL
2Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL
3Department of Medicine, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL

ACG Case Rep J 2016;3(4):e88. http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/crj.2016.61. Published online: July 27, 2016.

Case Report

A 29-year-old African-American woman with borderline personality disorder and an extensive psychiatric history of foreign body ingestions and insertions into her skin requiring multiple surgeries presented with foreign body ingestion 1 day prior to admission. One week prior to admission, she had stabbed herself in the abdomen with a needle and had swallowed a thumbtack. Work-up was negative, and the patient was sent to nearby psychiatry facility. While there, the patient noted worsening abdominal pain located in midline near the sternum and left side of the abdomen, as well as diarrhea and occasional hematochezia. She noted that she was angry the evening before hospital admission and had swallowed some board game pieces after a verbal altercation. Her hemoglobin and hematocrit were 10.7 g/dL and 34.4%, respectively. Serial abdominal x-ray imaging was performed to monitor passage of the foreign bodies (Figure 1). The patient agreed to stop narcotics and take polyethylene glycol to speed transit time. Her abdominal pain progressively improved, and all foreign bodies passed in stool after 8 hospitalized days.

CG-CGCR160026F001

Figure 1. Plain film radiograph showing foreign bodies in the abdomen on (A) day of admission, (B) day 3 of admission, and (C) day 7 of admission.

Management of foreign body ingestions depends on many factors, including the patient’s clinical status and the location, size, and shape of the objects ingested.1,2 Most objects that reach the stomach pass conservatively, but endoscopic intervention is required in up to 76% of patients with intentional ingestions, and surgical intervention is required in up to 16%.3,4 Serial plain abdominal x-rays remain the modality of choice for assessing foreign body passage.


Disclosures

Author contributions: All authors wrote and edited the manuscript. AC Berry is the article guarantor.

Financial disclosure: None to report.

Informed consent was obtained for this case report.

Correspondence: Andrew C. Berry, DO, 2451 Fillingim St, Mobile, AL, 36617-2238 (aberry5555@gmail.com).

Received January 4, 2016; Accepted January 15, 2016


References

  1. Pellerin D, Fortier-Beaulieu M, Guegen J. The fate of swallowed foreign bodies: Experience of 1250 instances of subdiaphragmatic foreign bodies in children. Program Pediatr Radiol. 1969;2:302.
  2. Carp L. Foreign bodies in the intestine. Ann Surg. 1927;85(4):575. Pubmed
  3. Palta R, Sahota A, Bemarki A, et al. Foreign-body ingestion: Characteristics and outcomes in a lower socioeconomic population with predominantly intentional ingestion. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69(3 pt 1):426–33. Article | Pubmed
  4. Weiland ST, Schurr MJ. Conservative management of ingested foreign bodies. J Gastrointest Surg. 2002;6(3):496–500. Pubmed

CC Icon

© 2016 Nakshabendi et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0.