Volume 3, Issue 4 | August 2016
Image | Liver

Atypical Image of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Mimicking Hemangioma

Download PDF

Prapimphan Aumpansub, MD1, Roongruedee Chaiteerakij, MD, PhD1, Nopavut Geratikornsupuk, MD2, Kessarin Thanapirom, MD1, Anapat Sanpavat, MD3, Bundit Chaopathomkul, MD4, and Sombat Treeprasertsuk, MD, PhD1

1Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, The Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
2Department of Medicine, Queen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital, Chonburi, Thailand
3Department of Pathology, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, The Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
4Department of Radiology, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, The Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand

ACG Case Rep J 2016;3(4):e119. http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/crj.2016.92. Published online: August 31, 2016.

Case Report

A 77-year-old woman presented with progressive right upper quadrant abdominal pain and 33-pound weight loss over 3 months. Physical examination revealed an enlarged liver with a span of 14 cm. Laboratory results showed: aspartate aminotransferase, 126 IU/L; alanine aminotransferase, 50 IU/L; total bilirubin, 2.8 mg/dL; alkaline phosphatase, 213 IU/L; α-fetoprotein, 11 IU/mL, and hepatitis B surface antigen was positive. Computed tomography (CT) demonstrated liver cirrhosis with a huge heterogeneous mass in the right hepatic lobe. It exhibited peripheral nodular enhancement in arterial phase with centripetal fill-in through portovenous and delay phase (Figure 1), mimicking radiologic characteristics of hemangioma, the most common primary liver tumor. Other parts of the mass also showed hyperattenuation in arterial phase with rapid washout in portovenous and delay phase (Figure 2), representing typical radiologic characteristics of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).1 Liver biopsy showed dysplastic small cells with polymorphic nuclei (Figure 3), thus confirming the diagnosis of HCC. Fatty change was also noted (Figure 4).


Figure 1. Dynamic CT showing atypical imaging of HCC with (A) focal bright hyperdensity (white arrow) and low attenuated area (black arrow) representing calcification and fat tissue, respectively, (B) nonenhancing area (star) and focal arterial enhancing area (arrow) representing necrotic area and peliotic change, respectively, and (C and D) delayed enhancing area (double arrowhead) representing fibrosis.


Figure 2. (A and B) CT showing heterogenous arterial enhancing mass with rapid washout in (C) portovenous and (D) delay phase, representing radiologic features of HCC.

The diagnosis of HCC is generally made by classical enhancement pattern of dynamic contrast enhanced imaging. However, large HCC may have atypical enhancement patterns, due to calcification, fatty change, tumor necrosis, peliotic change,2 or fibrosis that mimics other benign or malignant hepatic masses, including hemangioma,3 large regenerative nodules, abscess, or angiosarcoma. As most of blood supply to HCC is from branches of hepatic artery, HCC has early enhancement in arterial phase and “washout” in venous and delay phase. Hemangioma also receives blood supply from branches of hepatic artery; however, it contains multiple cavernous venous spaces. This leads to radiologic features of peripheral nodular enhancement, which represents venous spaces, in arterial phase, and “progressive” enhancement through venous and delay phase. In summary, HCC and hemangioma are sometimes difficult to differentiate radiographically, particularly in the setting of fatty liver or cirrhosis. A biopsy with a histopathological diagnosis is required in such setting.


Figure 3. Histopathology showing dysplastic small cells with polymorphic nuclei and increased nuclear to cytoplasmic ratio in nests of thick trabeculae (arrow), confirming diagnosis of HCC.


Figure 4. Histopathology showing part of clear cells with vacuoles pushing the nucleus to the periphery of the cell representing macrovesicular steatosis/fatty change (arrow).


Author contribution: P. Aumpansub, R. Chaiteerakij, A. Sanpavat, and B. Chaopathomkul generated the data. P. Aumpansub and R. Chaiteerakij drafted the manuscript. R. Chaiteerakij, K. Thanapirom, N. Geratikornsupuk, S. Treeprasertsuk, A. Sanpavat, and B. Chaopathomkul reviewed the manuscript. R. Chaiteerakij is the article guarantor.

Financial disclosure: None.

Informed consent was obtained for this publication.

Correspondence: Roongruedee Chaiteerakij, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok 10330, Thailand (roon.chaiteerakij@chula.md).

Received Feburary 11, 2016; Accepted March 11, 2016


  1. Sherman M. The radiological diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:610–12. Article | PubMed
  2. Hoshimoto S, Morise Z, Suzuki K, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma with extensive peliotic change. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009;16(4):566–70. Article | PubMed
  3. Kawasaki T, Kudo M, Inui K, Ogawa C, Chung H, Minami Y. Hepatocellular carcinoma mimicking carvenous hemangioma on angiography and contrast enhanced harmonic ultrasonography, a case report. Hepatol Res.2003;25:202–12. PubMed

CC Icon

© 2016 Aumpansub et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0.